As we saw yesterday, there are so many ways to describe a performance from movement description to program notes. Although all of these elements of a critic's essay can be powerful, I believe the punctuation in between the words carries an equal power to articulate the experience. A period can punch. Commas can breath. With just these two simply sentences, rhythm exists. If punctuation is utilized as creatively as the words that surround them not only can the essay describe the scene, but also the experience.
Tying back to poetry and dance, why should poetry just be connected to movement? I think poetry goes hand-in-hand with performance description, evaluation, and interpretation. In some cases, the result can be enticing. For example, Cynthia Bond Perry writes about the Ballethnic Dance Company saying, “Strong and fluid, with subtly refined control, Gentry crouched, exploded into triple turns and sprung into multiple leaps…” Reading this, hearing this, seeing this is an experience in its own right while revitalizing life to an in the moment experience unlike any other.
Of course there is a delicate balance between creative writing and informative writing, especially when there is a word limit. Other factors such as audience or motive can lead a writer to find their own balance. Do you believe that creative writing is more important than informative writing in a critic’s essay, or visa versa? Why? Which would you prefer to read?